• Defense Attorney Bob Motta On The Prosecution's Closing In Karen Read's Trial
    Jul 2 2024
    In the podcast "Hidden Killers with Tony Brueski," Defense Attorney Bob Motta discusses the closing arguments in a high-profile case involving the death of John O'Keefe. The prosecution, represented by Lally, attempts to downplay the unprofessional and indefensible text messages from Trooper Proctor, arguing they had no impact on the investigation's integrity. Despite this, Motta criticizes the apparent bias and hasty conclusions made by Proctor. The conversation shifts to the personal dynamics between the defendant and John O'Keefe, with allegations of jealousy and infidelity during a trip to Aruba. Motta and Brueski dissect these claims, emphasizing that while they may paint a picture of an unhealthy relationship, they do not substantiate the charge of second-degree murder. Motta contends that the prosecution overcharged the defendant and suggests that a manslaughter charge would have been more appropriate given the evidence. The conversation highlights the complexities and perceived weaknesses in the prosecution's case, ultimately questioning the decision to pursue such a severe charge.

    **Main Points:**

    - Prosecution downplays the significance of Trooper Proctor's unprofessional texts.
    - Proctor's bias and rapid conclusions criticized by the defense.
    - Discussion of jealousy and infidelity allegations during a trip to Aruba involving the defendant and John O'Keefe.
    - Analysis of the prosecution's strategy to depict the defendant as a jealous girlfriend.
    - Argument that these personal dynamics do not equate to second-degree murder.
    - Suggestion that the prosecution overcharged and should have pursued manslaughter instead.
    - Emphasis on the prosecution's weak case and the jury's potential confusion due to overcharging.

    **Hashtags:**
    #HiddenKillers #TonyBrueski #BobMotta #JohnOKeefe #TrooperProctor #SecondDegreeMurder #Manslaughter

    Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj
    Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
    The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK’s Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
    Mostra di più Mostra meno
    11 min
  • Did John O'Keefe Break Karen Read's Taillight?
    Jul 2 2024
    In this episode of "Hidden Killers With Tony Brueski," retired FBI Special Agent and Chief of the Counterintelligence Behavioral Analysis Program, Robin Dreeke, discusses the controversial trial of Karen Read. They delve into the closing arguments, focusing particularly on the evidence surrounding the tail light of Karen Read’s vehicle. The prosecution claims that pieces of the tail light were found at the scene weeks after the initial search, raising questions about the integrity of the investigation. The defense argues that the evidence may have been planted and highlights discrepancies in testimonies about where the pieces were found. Brueski and Dreeke discuss the plausibility of the tail light breaking due to the alleged collision and suggest that a re-enactment, similar to a Mythbusters episode, could have clarified the situation. They express skepticism about the tail light theory and question the thoroughness of the investigation, emphasizing the difficulty the jury will face in reaching a verdict. Both acknowledge the possibility of a hung jury due to the numerous unanswered questions and complexities surrounding the case.

    **Main Points:**
    - Discussion of Karen Read's trial and the controversial evidence.
    - Focus on the tail light evidence and its questionable integrity.
    - Prosecution's claim of finding tail light pieces weeks after the initial search.
    - Defense's argument about the possibility of planted evidence.
    - Discrepancies in testimonies regarding the location of the tail light pieces.
    - Skepticism about the tail light breaking due to the alleged collision.
    - Suggestion for a re-enactment to test the plausibility of the tail light theory.
    - Acknowledgment of the jury's challenging task and the potential for a hung jury.

    #KarenRead #TonyBrueski #RobinDreeke #TrooperProcter #TrialAnalysis #JuryBias #JusticeSystem
    Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj
    Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
    The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK’s Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
    Mostra di più Mostra meno
    7 min
  • Defense Attorney Eric Faddis On The Confused Prosecution Of Karen Read
    Jul 2 2024
    In the latest episode of "Hidden Killers With Tony Brueski," the discussion centers around the trial of Karen Read, which is in its final stages. Former Felony Prosecutor and attorney Eric Faddis provides insights into the dynamics of the trial as it approaches its conclusion. Faddis notes that while the prosecution has a strong case, the momentum seems to have shifted in favor of the defense as deliberations enter their third day. This extended deliberation period suggests possible jury gridlock, which could result in a mistrial. The conversation highlights the various charges Read faces, including second-degree murder, motor vehicle manslaughter, and leaving the scene of a collision causing death. They delve into the prosecution's closing arguments, particularly focusing on text messages Read sent the night of the incident, which are used to construct a timeline of events. Despite the prosecution's effort to present a coherent narrative, Faddis expresses skepticism about whether they successfully bridged the gap between typical relationship issues and the alleged intent to commit murder.

    **Main Points:**

    - The trial of Karen Read is nearing its conclusion with jury deliberations in the third day.
    - The defense appears to have gained momentum, but the prosecution still has a strong case.
    - Possible outcomes include second-degree murder, motor vehicle manslaughter, leaving the scene of a collision causing death, not guilty, or a hung jury.
    - Extended jury deliberation suggests potential gridlock and the possibility of a mistrial.
    - The prosecution’s closing arguments focused on a timeline created from Read's text messages the night of the incident.
    - Texts include voicemails and messages sent to John O'Keefe, reflecting a tumultuous relationship.
    - Eric Faddis doubts whether the prosecution successfully linked relationship troubles to the intent to commit murder.

    **Hashtags:**
    #KarenRead #EricFaddis #TonyBrueski #JuryDeliberations #MurderTrial #Prosecution #Defense
    Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj
    Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
    The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK’s Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
    Mostra di più Mostra meno
    6 min
  • Ret. FBI Jennifer Coffindaffer On WHY There Wasn't A Better Police Investigation In Karen Read Case? -Half Year Review
    Jul 2 2024
    Welcome to the "Half Year Review," where we delve into the true stories behind this year's most compelling headlines. Your host, Tony Brueski, joins hands with a rotating roster of guests, sharing their insights and analysis on a collection of intriguing, perplexing, and often chilling stories that have dominated the news.

    This is not your average news recap. With the sharp investigative lens of Tony and his guests, the show uncovers layers beneath the headlines, offering a comprehensive perspective that traditional news can often miss. From high-profile criminal trials to in-depth examinations of ongoing investigations, this podcast takes listeners on a fascinating journey through the world of true crime and current events.

    Throughout the past six months, we've followed and dissected cases such as Ruby Franke and Jodi Hildebrandt, Harmony Montgomery, the Delphi Murders, Kouri Richins, Bryan Kohberger, Rex Heuermann, Alex Murdaugh, Chad and Lori Daybell, and the Adelson family. Each episode navigates through these stories, illuminating their details with factual reporting, expert commentary, and engaging conversation. Tony and his guests discuss each case's nuances, complexities, and human elements, delivering a multi-dimensional understanding to their audience.

    Whether you are a dedicated follower of true crime or an everyday listener interested in the stories shaping our world, the "Half Year Review" brings you the perfect balance of intrigue, information, and intelligent conversation. Expect thoughtful analysis, informed opinions, and thought-provoking discussions beyond the 24-hour news cycle.

    Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj
    Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
    The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK’s Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
    Mostra di più Mostra meno
    8 min
  • Judge Declares Mistrial in Karen Read Case as Jury Deadlocks in Death of Boston Officer
    Jul 2 2024
    JURY STATEMENT:
    “Despite all commitment to the duty entrusted to us, we find ourselves deeply divided by fundamental differences in our opinions and state of mind. The divergence in our views is not rooted in a lack of understanding or effort, but in deeply held convictions that each of us carry ultimately leading to a point where consensus is unattainable. We recognize the weight of this submission and the implications it holds.”

    A judge declared a mistrial Monday in the high-profile case of Karen Read, accused of killing her boyfriend, Boston police officer John O’Keefe, by striking him with her SUV and leaving him to die in a snowstorm. The case, which captivated true crime enthusiasts and conspiracy theorists alike, ended in a deadlock after jurors failed to reach a unanimous verdict despite weeks of deliberation.

    Read, a former adjunct professor at Bentley College, faced charges of second-degree murder and other offenses in connection with the death of O’Keefe, a 16-year veteran of the Boston Police Department. O’Keefe was found outside a fellow officer’s home in Canton in January 2022, with an autopsy revealing he died of hypothermia and blunt force trauma.

    Prosecutors alleged that Read and O’Keefe had been drinking heavily before she dropped him off at the home of Officer Brian Albert, hitting him with her SUV as she left. “The defendant repeatedly said, ‘I hit him. I hit him. Oh my God. I hit him,’” stated Prosecutor Adam Lally, referencing Read’s alleged statements after O’Keefe was found.

    The defense portrayed Read as a victim of a rushed and biased investigation. They suggested that O’Keefe was killed inside Albert’s home, dragged outside, and left to die. “You have been lied to,” defense attorney Alan Jackson told the jury during closing arguments, asserting that the case was a “cover-up” to protect other officers.

    The trial featured significant evidence of police misconduct. Lead investigator State Trooper Michael Proctor admitted to sending offensive texts about Read during the investigation, which he later apologized for, though he maintained they did not influence his work. Additionally, police acknowledged using unorthodox methods to collect evidence, including red plastic cups and a leaf blower.

    Forensic experts were divided on whether O’Keefe’s injuries were consistent with being struck by Read’s SUV, which had a broken taillight. The defense pointed to injuries that suggested an altercation and the presence of Albert’s aggressive dog as potential factors in O’Keefe’s death. The jury was unable to reach a consensus on these conflicting accounts.

    **Hashtags:**
    #KarenRead #JohnOKeefe #BostonPolice #Mistrial #TrueCrime #ForensicEvidence #JusticeForJohnOkeefe
    Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj
    Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
    The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK’s Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
    Mostra di più Mostra meno
    17 min
  • Did The Commonwealth Make Their Case Against Karen Read?
    Jul 1 2024
    In the podcast episode "Hidden Killers With Tony Brueski," retired FBI Special Agent and Chief of the Counterintelligence Behavioral Analysis Program, Robin Dreeke, discusses the sensational trial of Karen Read. As the trial nears its conclusion, Dreeke and Brueski delve into the defense's arguments and the potential outcomes. Karen Read faces charges of second-degree murder, manslaughter while operating a vehicle under the influence, and leaving the scene of an accident resulting in death. Dreeke is particularly interested in the jury instructions and how they might influence the verdict. The conversation shifts to the integrity of the investigation, specifically addressing issues with lead investigator Trooper Procter, whose personal biases and unprofessional conduct may have tainted the investigation. Dreeke and Brueski emphasize the challenges jurors face in remaining objective, given the complex nature of the case and the influence of personal biases. They conclude that reasonable doubt may play a significant role in the jury's decision, stressing the importance of an objective evaluation of the evidence presented.

    **Main Points:**
    - Karen Read's trial has garnered significant public attention.
    - The jury has not yet reached a verdict as of the recording.
    - Dreeke and Brueski discuss the defense's performance and the charges against Read.
    - Charges include second-degree murder, manslaughter while operating a vehicle under the influence, and leaving the scene of an accident resulting in death.
    - Integrity of the lead investigator, Trooper Procter, is questioned due to personal biases and unprofessional conduct.
    - The discussion highlights the challenges jurors face in maintaining objectivity and the potential impact of personal biases on the verdict.
    - Reasonable doubt is emphasized as a crucial factor in the jury's decision-making process.

    #KarenRead #TonyBrueski #RobinDreeke #TrooperProcter #TrialAnalysis #JuryBias #JusticeSystem
    Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj
    Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
    The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK’s Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
    Mostra di più Mostra meno
    9 min
  • Judge Declares Mistrial For Karen Read, What Next?
    Jul 1 2024
    A judge declared a mistrial Monday in the high-profile case of Karen Read, accused of killing her boyfriend, Boston police officer John O’Keefe, by striking him with her SUV and leaving him to die in a snowstorm. The case, which captivated true crime enthusiasts and conspiracy theorists alike, ended in a deadlock after jurors failed to reach a unanimous verdict despite weeks of deliberation.

    Read, a former adjunct professor at Bentley College, faced charges of second-degree murder and other offenses in connection with the death of O’Keefe, a 16-year veteran of the Boston Police Department. O’Keefe was found outside a fellow officer’s home in Canton in January 2022, with an autopsy revealing he died of hypothermia and blunt force trauma.

    Prosecutors alleged that Read and O’Keefe had been drinking heavily before she dropped him off at the home of Officer Brian Albert, hitting him with her SUV as she left. “The defendant repeatedly said, ‘I hit him. I hit him. Oh my God. I hit him,’” stated Prosecutor Adam Lally, referencing Read’s alleged statements after O’Keefe was found.

    The defense portrayed Read as a victim of a rushed and biased investigation. They suggested that O’Keefe was killed inside Albert’s home, dragged outside, and left to die. “You have been lied to,” defense attorney Alan Jackson told the jury during closing arguments, asserting that the case was a “cover-up” to protect other officers.

    The trial featured significant evidence of police misconduct. Lead investigator State Trooper Michael Proctor admitted to sending offensive texts about Read during the investigation, which he later apologized for, though he maintained they did not influence his work. Additionally, police acknowledged using unorthodox methods to collect evidence, including red plastic cups and a leaf blower.

    Forensic experts were divided on whether O’Keefe’s injuries were consistent with being struck by Read’s SUV, which had a broken taillight. The defense pointed to injuries that suggested an altercation and the presence of Albert’s aggressive dog as potential factors in O’Keefe’s death. The jury was unable to reach a consensus on these conflicting accounts.

    Read’s supporters, identifiable by their pink attire, gathered outside the Norfolk Superior Court daily, carrying signs reading “Free Karen Read” and expressing their belief in her innocence. “This case has been a circus,” one supporter remarked, criticizing the media attention and alleged investigative flaws.

    Despite the mistrial, prosecutors signaled their intention to retry the case, continuing to assert that Read was responsible for O’Keefe’s death. The case will now return to court, prolonging the search for justice in a deeply polarizing and contentious trial.

    **Hashtags:**
    #KarenRead #JohnOKeefe #BostonPolice #Mistrial #TrueCrime #ForensicEvidence #JusticeForJohnOkeefe

    Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj
    Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
    The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK’s Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
    Mostra di più Mostra meno
    7 min
  • Difficult Decisions For The Karen Read Jury
    Jul 1 2024
    In this episode of "Hidden Killers With Tony Brueski," defense attorney Bob Motta discusses the trial of Karen Read, who is currently awaiting a verdict. The jury is struggling to reach a consensus, reflecting the divided opinions in society. Motta explains that this case epitomizes reasonable doubt, especially under Massachusetts' high standard of "moral certainty." The jury's indecision may lead to a hung jury, and Motta predicts that a verdict is unlikely. The judge has not yet given a "dynamite" charge to push for a decision, leaving the possibility open. If the jury remains deadlocked, the judge may declare a mistrial, allowing the Commonwealth to decide whether to retry the case. Motta highlights the strategic considerations for the prosecution, including their ability to address issues from the first trial and whether Karen Read can afford her high-caliber defense team again. The Commonwealth typically has a set deadline, often around 30 days, to decide on a retrial. The conversation underscores the complexities and uncertainties inherent in this high-profile case.

    **Main Points:**
    - The jury in Karen Read's trial is unable to reach a verdict, reflecting societal divisions.
    - Massachusetts requires a high standard of "moral certainty" for a guilty verdict.
    - Bob Motta predicts a hung jury and eventual mistrial.
    - The judge has not yet issued a "dynamite" charge to compel a verdict.
    - In case of a mistrial, the Commonwealth decides whether to retry the case.
    - Strategic considerations include addressing issues from the first trial and Read's ability to fund her defense.
    - The Commonwealth has a deadline, typically around 30 days, to decide on a retrial.

    #KarenRead #TonyBrueski #BobMoWant to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj
    Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

    The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK’s Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.comtta #DefenseDiaries #MoralCertainty #HungJury #Mistrial
    Mostra di più Mostra meno
    6 min